77 -2 (88) 2026 - B.N. Bishekova, B.K. Zharkynbekov - OUTCOMES OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF LABOR INDUCTION IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH FETAL MACROSOMIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
- B.N. Bishekova - Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, City Maternity Hospital, Kazakhstan Medical University, Kazakhstan.
- B.K. Zharkynbekov - Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, City Maternity Hospital, Kazakhstan Medical University, Kazakhstan.
- Zh.U. Sultanova - Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, City Maternity Hospital, Kazakhstan Medical University, Kazakhstan.
- K.U. Abdraimova - Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, City Maternity Hospital, Kazakhstan Medical University, Kazakhstan.
- D.M. Sailaubai - Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, City Maternity Hospital, Kazakhstan Medical University, Kazakhstan.
- S.E. Nurzhanova - Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, City Maternity Hospital, Kazakhstan Medical University, Kazakhstan.
- M.K. Omirbay - Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, City Maternity Hospital, Kazakhstan Medical University, Kazakhstan.
Resume: The increasing number of labor inductions, including in women with a large fetus, necessitates the search for the safest and most effective methods of cervical ripening. A large fetus is associated with a higher risk of obstetric complications and cesarean section, making the choice of labor management strategy particularly important.
Key words: Keywords. Labor induction, large fetus, misoprostol, dinoprostone, Foley catheter, delivery, cesarean section.
Pages: 385–391
For citation:
B.N. Bishekova, B.K. Zharkynbekov., Zh.U. Sultanova., K.U. Abdraimova., D.M. Sailaubai., S.E. Nurzhanova., M.K. Omirbay. - OUTCOMES OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF LABOR INDUCTION IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH FETAL MACROSOMIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH SPONTANEOUS LABOR//New Day in Medicine 2(88)2026 385-391 https://newdayworldmedicine.com/en/new_day_medicine/2-88-2026
List of References
- Bishekova B.N., Kozhabekova T.A., Rakhimova S.B., et al. Opyt primeneniya prostaglandinov E1–E2 s tsel'yu induktsii rodov [Experience in using prostaglandins E1–E2 for labor induction]. Reproduktivnaya meditsina (Tsentral'naya Aziya). 2023;2:31–38. (in Russian)
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 849: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2): e110–e127.
- Baev O.R. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya [Effective pharmacotherapy]. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya. 2021;3:40-44. (in Russian)
- Beckmann M., Gibbons K., Flenady V., Kumar S. Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 127: 571–579.
- Ferrari M., Rossi A., Bianchi G. Mechanical methods for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(8):1300–1308. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14234
- Häggsgård C., Persson E.K. Management of oxytocin for labour augmentation in relation to mode of birth in Robson group 1. Midwifery. 2020;90:102822.
- Hofmeyr G.J., et al. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;5(5):CD000941.
- Jones A., et al. Adverse effects of misoprostol in labor induction: incidence and management. BJOG. 2020;127(3):370–378.
- Kim Y.J., et al. Misoprostol dosage and labor outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Int J Womens Health. 2023;15:91–98.
- Middleton P., Shepherd E., Morris J. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks’ gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7:CD004945